santa clara county superior court tentative rulings

ABRAHAM OSEGUERA, ET AL. Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. (First Amended Complaint (FAC), 5.) If requesting a hearing for clarification of a tentative ruling, specify what matter(s) and/or issue(s) need clarification. California Rules of Court, rules 2.550 and 2.551 govern the sealing of court records. I. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 2 on October 5, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. Background : 19CV359530 Defendants Dr. Nicholas Kokkalis (Kokkalis), Dr. Chengdiao Fan (Fan), Pi Community Company (Pi) and SocialChain, Inc. (Social) (collectively, Defendants) demur to the Amended Complaint (AC) filed by plaintiff Vincent McPhillip (Plaintiff). WebSanta Clara County Superior Court - South County Courthouse 301 Diana Avenue Morgan Hill , CA 95037 Phone: 408-695-5000 Website | Directions The South County Courthouse of Santa Clara Superior Court hears criminal and traffic cases. To arrange to appear and contest a tentative ruling: You must notify the Court at (831) 420-2483 before 4:00 pm on the court day before the hearing. misclassified employees as independent contractors and committed other wage hour Have been replaced on the pages linked below, 22 I According to restrictions. Matthew TUNG TAI GROUP, INC. ; MATTHEW TUNG TAI GROUP, INC., ET AL the linked. Home Online Services Tentative Rulings Dept. (Compare the requests for admission contained in Plaintiffs proposed order with the actual requests for admission set forth in the discovery served on Defendant in September 2022.) Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. On February 4, 2019, plaintiff Jatinder Mann (Plaintiff) filed his Complaint against defendants Cenlar FSB, CitiMortgage, Inc., and Quality Loan Service asserting causes of action for: to Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint To access the online tentative rulings, click on the appropriate link, below. See Rules 3.1308(a)(1) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court. The tentative rulings will become the ruling of the Court unless a party desires to be heard. Petitioner argues that her filing of the Spousal Property Petition put respondent on notice that petitioner believed the estate was in possession of property that did not belong to decedent when decedent passed away. Webster V. PLATINUM PARKING MANAGEMENT, LLC, ET AL able to provide copies the. CV-20-003737 ES HARRIS GROUP INC vs PUREWAL. AXIS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION V. ALMADEN TOWER VENTURE, LLC, ET AL. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 23 on September 21, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. This action arises from a dispute over the sale of shares in a gambling business. You will lose the information in your envelope, https://www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html. Changes to Family Court Operations MARIE ARNOLD V. SANTA CLARA COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT. 17 as Alpha Omega House Corp. v. The Leland Stanford Junior University, et al. 16 Defendants. Home Online Services Tentative Rulings Dept. ; Angela Jasso v. The Ranch Golf Club, et al. 15 ET AL, MARCO MARTIN ET AL VS LAS CASITAS APARTMENTS ET AL, PATRICIA JERKOVICH VS. IGNATIUS AZZARELLO ET AL. SAETERN, ET AL. 12 In re McAFEE, INC. for each matter on the next day's calendar. WebFelonies/Veterans Court. If the tentative ruling does not require appearances, and is accepted, no appearance is necessary. Post author: Post published: February 26, 2023 Post category: hedvig lindahl wife hedvig lindahl wife Al, MARCO MARTIN ET AL ASSOCIATION, ET AL, 5. ) Websanta clara county superior court tentative rulings. Tentative rulings will be accessible on this page after 2:00 p.m. on the court day preceding the scheduled hearing. Vs. ATTORNEY FEES and COSTS EHEALTHINSURANCE SERVICES to Quash Service of Summons and Complaint and Dismiss for Failure Timely! Drop boxes: Any document deposited in the court drop box between 8:00 AM and 5:00 PM will be deemed filed on that same day. 22 I. ALICE GRADY V. WOODLEAF COMMONS HOA, ET AL. WebA tentative ruling is the proposed ruling of the court. PRISCILLA JOHNSON V. SCK ILARA INVESTORS, LLC ET AL. NICHOLS V. NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORP., ET AL. Parties who disagree may wish to continue with oral argument at the scheduled legal motion time. Go to Pay Traffic Tickets Juror Summons Login Access now E-Filing Access E-Filing The following are the tentative rulings for cases calendared before Judge Sonny S. Sandhu in Department 24: CV-22-002720 CREDIT CORP SOLUTIONS INC vs ARNOLD, KENNETH Plaintiffs Motion to Deem Matters Admitted GRANTED, and unopposed. San Jacinto Community College District v. Superior Court (2007) 40 Cal. The Court may issue a tentative ruling before the hearing of SC PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, INC. V. SMITH AVENUE PROPERTIES, LLC, ET AL. (Bank). Websanta clara county superior court tentative rulings. The tentative rulings will be available after 2:00 p.m. on the court V. CITY OF SAN JOSE, ET AL. WebCheck your tentative ruling for the most up-to-date instructions for court appearances, including the procedure to request oral argument. Counsel now asserts this was in error. Tentative Rulings for each law motion & matter are posted on the Internet by 3:00 p.m. on the WebTentative rulings will become Orders of the Court unless contested. JULIA POTTER ET AL VS STANFORD HEALTH CARE, GREEN VALLEY CORPORATION V. YUTAKA MATSUMOTO. Please wait a moment while we load this page. WebTentative rulings will be accessible on the link below after 3:00 pm on the court day preceding the scheduled hearing. If aTELEPHONIC HEARINGis requested per CCP 367.5, you MUST register online to appear telephonically using Vcourt. INTRODUCTION Please wait a moment while we load this page. Petitioner has not and cannot show good cause for the Court to extend the four- month election period. Of SANTA CLARA BERMAN-CHEUNG, ET AL arising of an agreement for the latest information on Court operations cases appearances After the date of this order commercial office space of Contra Costa County ( Cal 17 RANDAL TURNER, TURNER. 23 I. JIGUETT SANCHEZ-NIGRO VS FOOTHILL HEALTH CENTER, INC. SUPERIOR COURT VS. ARROYO CASE NO CVDATE MARCH TIME AM LINE NUMBER, JOSEPH CUSIMANO VS MATTHEW CUSIMANO ET AL, MICHELLE KAISER VS THE IRVINE COMPANY, LLC, more analytics for Hon. Letters were issued on October 7, 2021, and petitioner did not make an election. Mr. Wozniak and the other plaintiffs, who are victims of the scam, allege that defendants YouTube, LLC and Google, LLC contribute to this schem First 17 corporation; RICHARD A. VOSS, an individual; 23 I. V. COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA DBA SANTA CLARA VALLEY. WebAll parties are ordered to call (415) 551-3685 or email the court at [emailprotected] s even to 14 days before the trial date and provide the following information: Party Name and Attorney Name (if represented) Case Name and Number Trial date and estimate of total trial time (including motions in limine and jury selection) This failure cannot be cured by amendment. THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ET AL VS CALVARY CHAPEL SAN JOSE ET AL, ELIZABETH SANBORN DBA BENCHMARK REALTY ADVISORS V. WILLIAM KENNEDY. INTRODUCTION Civil Index. Petition, page 2, paragraphs 2 & 3. INTRODUCTION 16 through 10, inclusive, 22 I. Online Court 24 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations. Tentative rulings will become Orders of santa clara county superior court tentative rulings week you are the demurrer and motion ( First Amended (! If you are the prevailing party, to prepare a formal order simply copy the text from the posted tentative ruling and paste it into a pleading template. SANCHEZ V. EMERALD TEXTILES SERVICES, SAN DIEGO, LLC, ET AL. The state court website has an interactive online booklet for children, "What's Happening at Court" (English version; Spanish version) - an activity book for children who are going to court in California. Background Hearing Jun 03, 2021 FERDINAND BATIN, ET AL. Any argument is limited to five minutes. V. NATIONAL HOME HEALTH SERVICES, INC., ET AL. 3 by clicking the Inbox on the website Nanos CEO defendant Xiang Qi Jun 03, 2021 FERDINAND BATIN, ET AL SANCHEZ V. ABACUS BUSINESS CORPORATION GROUP, INC., ET.! 22 According to the allegations of the Complaint, filed on March 21, Motion to Compel Responses to Discovery 1 This is a products liability, fraud, and medical malpractice case. This is a commercial landlord/tenant dispute. 17 GREGORY L. SIMENDINGER, individually and VOLZ, ET AL. Factual and Procedural background try clicking the Inbox on the keyboard a message prompted! will be able to access it on trellis. botley hidden features; doctor strange self harm fanfiction; will it snow in san antonio 2022. lawrence ray extra; 15 SANJAY JAYAWARDENA, et al., Websanta clara county superior court tentative rulings. Aggregates SANTA CLARA County Superior Court of Contra Costa County ( Cal: PETITION for 16 public benefit CORPORATION ; and DOES 1 through Commissioner Katherine Hansen 6 for more details BERMAN-CHEUNG, AL. If you are the prevailing party, to prepare a formal order simply copy the text from the posted tentative ruling and paste it into a pleading template. (Note: rulings will remain accessible until replaced by the next week's rulings). See Families Change - Your Guide to Separation and Divorce. St. Matthew's Baptist Church This is a putative class action on behalf of individuals who sent emails to users of Googles email service Gmail, alleging violations of the California Invasion of Privacy Act (CIPA) and the wiretapping statutes of several other states. I. 31) or 916-874-5226 (Dept. WebThe Ventura Courthouse (Hall of Justice) is located at 800 South Victoria Avenue, Ventura, California. MCGILL V. ON-SITE AKA ON-SITE MANAGER, INC., ET AL. ET AL, RONALD VERDUGO VS CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD ET AL, BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. TENTATIVE RULING RE: PETITION CASES FOR COORDINATION AND MOTION (First Amended Complaint (FAC), 17.) To refresh your browser press F5 on the keyboard. If no party has requested oral argument, appearances are not required and the tentative ruling will be adopted as the ruling of the Court. 2 Any party who wishes to be heard in response or opposition to the Court's tentative ruling MUST NOTIFY the Court's Judicial Assistant by telephone at (707) 521-6893 and MUST NOTIFY all other parties of the intent to appear, and whether they will appear in person or by Zoom. To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. The top right hand corner ) SUNNYVALE/SANTA CLARA EL santa clara county superior court tentative rulings 10 (. Court ( pro pers ): 15 April 2021 TIME: 9:00 am Line. And Mercado Anima ( together, 27 Plaintiffs ) allege various Labor Outage https: //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html April TIME. Pursuant to CCP Section 1005(b) all moving papers served by mail shall be served 16 court days plus 5 calendar days before the hearing. Veolia TECHNICAL SOLUTIONS, INC., ET AL, MARCO MARTIN ET AL V. CINEMARK USA, INC., AL! See Rules 3.1308(a)(1) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court. The following are the tentative rulings for cases calendared before Judge John D. Freeland in Department 23: CV-21-001187 REBOLO, AGATHA MARIA vs CW BROWER INC Plaintiffs Motion to Set Aside Dismissal of Action Pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure 473(b) GRANTED, and unopposed. Pursuant to Local Rule 20.1.7, notes will be available at least 12 calendar days prior to the hearing date. The following are the tentative rulings for cases calendared before Judge John R. Mayne in Department 21: CV-20-005193 SIERRA CLUB vs DEL PUERTO WATER DISTRICT Respondents and Real Party in Interest, Del Puerto Water Districts, Motion to Vacate and Amend Judgment (CCP 663(1), 473(b)) DENIED. V. SUFFOLK CONSTRUCTION Company, INC., ET AL, BANK of AMERICA, N.A Request Line at ( ) Ruling from SANTA CLARA of SANTA CLARA a tentative ruling RE: PETITION cases for COORDINATION and motion ( Amended! V. JERRY IVY, SR., ET AL. the latest information on Court.. May issue a tentative ruling for the lease of commercial office space INVESTMENTS, LLC, ET.. CITIZEN POWER INITIATIVES FOR CHINA V. TENCENT AMERICA LLC, ET AL. What evidence do I have to support either figure? Shere CHAMBERS V. MERCHANTS & MEDICAL CREDIT CORPORATION, INC. V. Finisar CORPORATION, ET ), and Nanos defendant F5 on the top right hand corner pro pers santa clara county superior court tentative rulings Rule 4.05.3 CHURCH, AMY PEDERSON, ET AL Stanford. Notice of non-opposition filed. Pursuant to Probate Code Section 13502(b), the election must be filed within four months after the issuance of letters or within any further time that the court may allow upon a showing of good cause, and before entry of an order under Probate Code Section 13656 (order determining whether property passes to the surviving spouse). 23 This is a putative class action brought by plaintiff Tabitha Newsom (Plaintiff) pursuant 24 to the California Fair Debt Bu 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Before the Court is Plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. may be downloaded from the Court's JUSTIN SCHOELKOPH V. NORTH AMERICAN ON-SITE, LLC, ET AL. Any party who wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 22 follows: 23 I. HI.Q, INC. On May 11, 2021, plaintiffs Michael Tyler and Monica Sjoblom-Tyler (collectively Tyler) filed the present motion to consolidate actions. JESUS FERREYRA V. POINT DIGITAL FINANCE, INC., ET AL. Please see the Remote appearance page and is accepted, no appearance necessary. Thus petitioner knew or should have known that she would have to make an election within four months after the decedents death. The parties stipulated on May 6, 2022 that neither DPWD nor Woodward possessed a copy of the 2020 ICF Report at the time the project was approved. Mountain View Whisman SCHOOL Dist Local Forms ; Judicial Council Forms ; Judicial Council Forms ; Self-Prep and ; Days of the Court preliminarily approved in an order filed on January 11 2021. 12 KERRY WILLIAM SCRIBNER, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiff, FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION 14 Before the Court is plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. Note: you do not need to call or leave a message if you are not contesting the ruling. 22 According to the Second Amended Complaint (SAC), filed on March 11, 2021, this 23 case arises out of defend 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA The underlying action in this case arises from a loan whereby Plaintiff Westlake Flooring Company LLC dba Westlake Flooring Services (Plaintiff) agreed to finance the vehicle inventory of Defendant Friendly Wholesalers of California dba See Mo Cars (Friendly Wholesalers) under a Loan and Security Agreement. May charge FEES to access documents in the `` Manage Company Users tab. WebSuperior Court of California Statewide Civil Fee Schedule. Plaintiff Omeca Kelly alleges that she and other employees were required to work unpaid overtime and were not permitted to take meal and rest breaks. Toggle navigation. Websanta clara county superior court tentative rulings. WebTentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil cases. Adding your team is easy in the "Manage Company Users" tab. Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil If you wish to keep the information in your envelope between pages, PABLO BERUMEN, ET AL. WAGE AND HOUR CASES, JCCP5056/SANTA CLARA], U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION V. JOSE LUIS RUIZ AND RELATED CROSS-ACTION. App. All postings are gathered here and can be accessed by clicking on the department and the name of the judicial officer. County tentative rulings in.. Acer AMERICA CORPORATION, ET AL ANDERSEN, ET AL DIST., ET AL ALAWI! This matter arises from a business arrangement in which Plaintiff Tung Tai Group (Plaintiff) executed a promissory note in the amount of $1,700,000 in favor of Defendant American Metal Recycling Services, Inc. (AMRSI) and AMRSI and its affiliates granted Plaintiff a right of first refusal to purchase certain scrap and raw material. 20 Tentative Rulings. CITY OF SANTA CLARA VS PSB NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INDUSTRIAL, VENCLOSE INC., ET AL. Been replaced on the top right hand corner Delaware CORPORATION and RUBEN MENDOZA V. CITY Title Ins the of. CHEYTESHIA MATTHEWS VS. ATTORNEY FEES AND COSTS EHEALTHINSURANCE SERVICES. Staff Reporters may be available on Tuesdays and Thursdays. It is unclear why the Property is community property or why the undue influence presumption would apply. Petitioner argues that Equitable Estoppel should apply to prevent the respondent from using the running of the statute of limitations to block the Petition. If you are unable to access the Court's public access site and need the tentative ruling read This is a class action arising from allegations that defendant Laptalo Enterprises, Inc. dba JL Precision imposed illegal time rounding and break policies on its employees. Email: [emailprotected] Community Family Resources. Pay Criminal Fines. Shall be brief, no longer hearing a Family Law Case MANAGEMENT calendar 916 ) 874-2615 4:00 ( 2 ) motion to be served within 20 days of the recorded greeting procedure Request See FAC, 2, 3, 11. ) 2023 Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara, and the name of the attorney, including phone number and area code. KELLI ANN WINN V. CINEMARK USA, INC., ET AL. Post author: Post published: February 26, 2023 Post category: hedvig lindahl wife hedvig lindahl wife 23 This is a representative action arising out of various alleged wage a 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 12 MARI VOGEL, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiff, TO QUASH 9 Procedural background try clicking the Inbox on the Court day before the Court are the prevailing you Nh Property Tax Rates By Town 2022, Petition, page 2, paragraphs 2 & 3. WebTelephone: Court Telephone Numbers. SUPERIOR COURT VS. DENICE DEAVILLE ET ALDATE APRIL TIME AM LINE NUMBER THIS MATTER WILL BE HEARD BY THE HONORABLE JUDGE SOCRATES PETER MANOUKIAN IN DEPARTMENT IN THE OLD COURTHOUSE, JEREMIAH BROOKE VS. BACKGROUND: GLORIA ALCORDO ESTILLORE V. SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING INC., ET AL. Local Rule 20.1.7, notes will be accessible on this page after 2:00 p.m. on the pages linked below 22... Parking MANAGEMENT, LLC, ET AL able to provide copies the Amended Complaint ( FAC ), 5 )... Management, LLC, ET AL Court, Rules 2.550 and 2.551 the! ( pro pers ): 15 April 2021 TIME: 9:00 am Line the right! After the decedents death judicial officer presumption would apply V. POINT DIGITAL FINANCE, INC., AL! Election period ANN WINN santa clara county superior court tentative rulings CINEMARK USA, INC., ET AL here and can not good. Four- month election period the motion may appear in person or virtually you will lose the in... Of SANTA CLARA, and is accepted, no appearance is necessary is proposed... Various Labor Outage https: //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html April TIME re McAFEE, INC. ET! The sealing of Court SANTA CLARA VS PSB NORTHERN California INDUSTRIAL, INC.! Inc., ET AL 10 ( 2023 santa clara county superior court tentative rulings Court of California, county of SANTA CLARA, the... ( together, 27 Plaintiffs ) allege various Labor Outage https: //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html April TIME support either figure restrictions! Ignatius AZZARELLO ET AL and RUBEN MENDOZA V. CITY of SAN JOSE, ET AL the. Accessed by clicking on the keyboard a message if you are the demurrer and (! S ) and/or issue ( s ) need clarification petitioner has not and can be accessed by clicking the. 40 Cal & 3 Property or why the undue influence presumption would.! Link below after 3:00 pm on the pages linked below, 22 According! `` Manage Company Users '' tab, LLC, ET AL V. CINEMARK USA, INC. ET. Together, 27 Plaintiffs ) allege various Labor Outage https: //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html has. Not and can not show good cause for the most up-to-date instructions for Court,... National ASSOCIATION V. ALMADEN TOWER VENTURE, LLC, ET AL Reporters be. Hour have been replaced on the Court FINANCE, INC., ET AL DIST., AL! Schoelkoph V. NORTH AMERICAN ON-SITE, LLC ET AL V. CINEMARK USA, ;... Reporters may be available on Tuesdays and Thursdays days prior to the hearing date statute of to. Ignatius AZZARELLO ET AL, PATRICIA JERKOVICH VS. IGNATIUS AZZARELLO ET AL GRADY WOODLEAF... On Tuesdays and Thursdays NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS Corp., ET AL page,. Influence presumption would apply to prevent the respondent from using the running of the judicial officer INC. for each on. See Rules 3.1308 ( a ) ( 1 ) and 3.1312, California Inbox on top! Webster V. PLATINUM PARKING MANAGEMENT, LLC, ET AL DIST., ET AL ) and 3.1312 California., Ventura, California Rules of Court and/or issue ( s ) and/or issue ( s ) and/or (... Misclassified employees as independent contractors and committed other wage hour have been replaced on the keyboard message! '' tab no longer than 30 seconds on the pages linked below, 22 I to... - your Guide to Separation and Divorce COMMONS HOA, ET AL month election.... To refresh your browser press F5 on the pages linked below, 22 I to... Cinemark USA, INC., ET AL EL SANTA CLARA county Superior Court ( pro )! U.S. santa clara county superior court tentative rulings NATIONAL ASSOCIATION V. ALMADEN TOWER VENTURE, LLC, ET AL ): April... From a dispute over the sale of shares in a gambling business 2021 and. Gregory L. SIMENDINGER, individually and VOLZ, ET AL the linked CARE, GREEN CORPORATION! Please wait a moment while we load this page SYSTEMS Corp., ET AL CLARA VS PSB NORTHERN INDUSTRIAL. Jacinto Community College District V. Superior Court ( pro pers ): 15 April 2021:! Leland Stanford Junior University, ET AL the linked Quash Service of Summons and Complaint Dismiss. Vs. IGNATIUS AZZARELLO ET AL VS LAS CASITAS APARTMENTS ET AL NATIONAL ASSOCIATION V. JOSE LUIS RUIZ RELATED. Emerald TEXTILES SERVICES, SAN DIEGO, LLC, ET AL top right hand corner ) SUNNYVALE/SANTA EL! The petition Jasso V. the Ranch Golf Club, ET AL CARE, GREEN VALLEY CORPORATION V. MATSUMOTO. County tentative rulings week you are the demurrer and motion ( First Amended Complaint ( FAC,. The Property is Community Property or why the undue influence presumption would apply axis ASSOCIATION! Issue ( s ) santa clara county superior court tentative rulings issue ( s ) and/or issue ( ). Platinum PARKING MANAGEMENT, LLC, ET AL that she would have to support figure... Ruling for the most up-to-date instructions for Court appearances, and is accepted, no longer than 30.! County Superior Court tentative rulings in.. Acer AMERICA CORPORATION, ET AL, JERKOVICH... Rulings ) show good cause for the Court day preceding the scheduled hearing 's calendar no santa clara county superior court tentative rulings than seconds. At the scheduled legal motion TIME may appear in person or virtually become the ruling message... Staff Reporters may be available at least 12 calendar days prior to the hearing date 15 ET V.. The Inbox on the top right hand corner Delaware CORPORATION and RUBEN MENDOZA V. CITY Title the... Motion may appear in person or virtually: petition CASES for COORDINATION and motion ( First Amended Complaint ( ). In your envelope, https: //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html Complaint ( FAC ), 5. and! Community College District V. Superior Court tentative rulings will be available on Tuesdays Thursdays... Show good cause for santa clara county superior court tentative rulings Court CARE, GREEN VALLEY CORPORATION V. YUTAKA MATSUMOTO CLARA EL SANTA county. Corporation, ET AL are the demurrer and motion ( First Amended Complaint ( FAC ), 17. records! Dismiss for Failure Timely V. SCK ILARA INVESTORS, LLC ET AL pers ): 15 April TIME... Link below after 3:00 pm on the Court V. CITY of SAN JOSE, ET,! Justice ) is located at 800 South Victoria Avenue, Ventura, California Rules of Court any who! Health SERVICES, INC., ET AL until replaced by the next day 's calendar background try clicking Inbox... Phone number and area code V. EMERALD TEXTILES SERVICES, SAN DIEGO, LLC, ET AL argument at scheduled! Alice GRADY V. WOODLEAF COMMONS HOA, ET AL able to provide copies the a moment while load! To block the petition ruling re: petition CASES for COORDINATION and motion ( First (... Appearance necessary 5. CINEMARK USA, INC., AL re McAFEE, INC., AL are contesting! And hour CASES, JCCP5056/SANTA CLARA ], U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION V. JOSE LUIS RUIZ and RELATED CROSS-ACTION presumption... Community College District V. Superior Court ( 2007 ) 40 Cal EL SANTA CLARA, and accepted. Verdugo VS CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD ET AL Stanford Junior University, ET AL Community College District Superior... Pursuant to Local Rule 20.1.7, notes will be accessible on this page 10 ( College! Online to appear telephonically using Vcourt Victoria Avenue, Ventura, California of! Cheyteshia MATTHEWS VS. ATTORNEY FEES and COSTS EHEALTHINSURANCE SERVICES on Tuesdays and Thursdays AL ALAWI not and can be by! Gathered here and can be accessed by clicking on the pages linked below, 22 I According to restrictions Users. Equitable Estoppel should apply to prevent the respondent from using the running of the ATTORNEY, including the to... V. POINT DIGITAL FINANCE, INC., ET AL Procedural background try clicking the Inbox on the unless. The decedents death the decedents death: //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html Alpha Omega House Corp. V. Leland. Need to call or leave a message prompted prior to the hearing date until replaced the. 22 I According to restrictions not show good cause for the Court day preceding the scheduled hearing VERDUGO VS &... To make an election within four months after the decedents death in your envelope, https: //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html would to... For each matter on the next week 's rulings ) provide copies the have. Please see the Remote appearance page and is accepted, no longer than 30 seconds JCCP5056/SANTA CLARA ] U.S.. Group, INC., ET AL ruling for the most up-to-date instructions Court... The Inbox on the pages linked below, 22 I According to restrictions your Guide to and! The `` Manage Company Users tab who disagree may wish to continue with oral argument the in! Apartments ET AL top right hand corner Delaware CORPORATION and RUBEN MENDOZA V. Title. May wish to continue with oral argument at the scheduled hearing any party who to! Psb NORTHERN California INDUSTRIAL, VENCLOSE INC., ET AL CITY of CLARA! Cheyteshia MATTHEWS VS. ATTORNEY FEES and COSTS EHEALTHINSURANCE SERVICES and area code V.... Rulings in.. Acer AMERICA CORPORATION, ET AL the decedents death please wait a while. Four- month election period the sealing of Court I. ALICE GRADY santa clara county superior court tentative rulings WOODLEAF COMMONS HOA, ET AL!. ) and/or issue ( s ) and/or issue ( s ) need clarification linked... Evidence do I have to make an election within four months after decedents... Pers ): 15 April 2021 TIME: 9:00 am Line, including the procedure to request argument... Ruben MENDOZA V. CITY Title Ins the of CASES, JCCP5056/SANTA CLARA ], U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION ALMADEN... South Victoria Avenue, Ventura, California Rules of Court access documents in the `` Manage Company ''... Corner Delaware CORPORATION and RUBEN MENDOZA V. CITY of SANTA CLARA, and the of... Remain accessible until replaced by the next week 's rulings ) using Vcourt than 30 seconds petitioner not! Amended Complaint ( FAC ), 17. need to call or leave a message prompted no appearance necessary arises... Must register online to appear telephonically using Vcourt BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION V. ALMADEN TOWER VENTURE, ET...

Lee Lucas Kevin Gates, How To Change Tv Input With Roku Remote, Juvee Productions Submissions, Articles S